000			03072cam a22004092a 4500
001			022874660
003			GSU
005			20230622120736.0
006			m o d
007			cr u||||||||||
008			210507p20162019xx o u00| u eng d
020			_a9789535127772
020			_a9535127772
024	8		_a10.5772/64472
035			_a(OCoLC)1250417514 _z(OCoLC)1154167218
037			_5BiblioBoard
040			_aGSU _beng _cGSU _dGSU _dGSU _dGSU _dGSU _erda
049			_aEQOA
050			_aSB195
092			_aWMS1250417514
100	1		_aRabelo, Carlos H.S., _eauthor.
245	1	0	_aSurvey About The Use of Bacterial inoculants in Brazil _bEffects On Silage Quality and Animal Performance / _cCarlos H.S. Rabelo.
264		1	_a[s.l.] : _bIntechOpen, _c2016.
300			_a1 online resource vii;196 pages _billustrations( same colour)
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
520			_aOur objective was to report the effect of bacterial inoculants on silage quality and animal responses in Brazil. A survey of bacterial inoculants utilization in Brazil was made based on a total of 178 published articles assessing a widely varied crops (alfalfa, cabbage, cassava, corn, grass, high-moisture corn (HMC), high-moisture sorghum, millet, oat, orange bagasse, peanut forage, sorghum, soybean, stylosantes Campo Grande, sugarcane, and sunflower). Sugarcane and grass silages comprised 58.1% of the total crops investigated. Homolactic inoculation reduced dry matter (DM) losses in alfalfa silages, but not in corn, grass, HMC, and sorghum silages. Heterolactic inoculation enhanced the aerobic stability of corn and HMC silages. The use of heterofermentative lactic acid-bacteria (LAB) was more effective to improve fermentation of sugarcane silages compared to homofermentative LAB. Inoculation impaired the DM intake in cattle fed corn, grass, and sugarcane silages, but DM intake increased in sheep due to inoculation. In some cases, silage digestibility was affected by inoculation. Positive responses to inoculation occurred most often when the compatibility between the bacterial inoculant and crop was better understood (e.g., homolactic inoculation for grass silage and heterolactic inoculation for sugarcane silage). The performance of animals consuming inoculated silages has been investigated in Brazil only a few times, but the data suggest a greater impact of bacterial inoculants on DM intake and weight gain in cattle and sheep than that indicated in temperate conditions.
588	0		_aDescription based on print version record.
650		0	_aTechnology.
650		6	_aTechnologie.
650		7	_aTechnology & Engineering / Food Science. _2bisacsh
650		7	_aTechnology. _2fast _0(OCoLC)fst01145078
758			_iIs found in: _aIntechOpen _1https://openresearchlibrary.org/module/6fa8fc5a-d2f9-4baa-85b9-a6d55e02e354
856	4	0	_3Directory of Open Access Books _uhttps://directory.doabooks.org/handle/20.500.12854/40354 _70
942			_2lcc _cBK _n0
999			_c1743 _d1743